Searchin

Innovit labs

Menu

Get in Touch

Google Bard vs ChatGPT:
A Comparative Analysis

Comparing ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: Highlighting Advantages, Disadvantages, and Practical Uses!

Tejas Kaneriya

February 10, 2023

8 mins read

Last Updated May 10, 2023

Google Bard vs ChatGPT: the key differences

In order to compare Google Bard to ChatGPT, one must comprehend each product's special features, constraints, and useful applications in real-world situations. The artificial intelligence (AI) market is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 38.1%, indicating an unparalleled upsurge globally. It is projected to reach a staggering $1,811.8 billion by 2030, propelled by ground-breaking developments in generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Google Bard. Our interactions with text have significantly changed as a result of ChatGPT and Google Bard. With its remarkable storytelling skills, Google's Bard seeks to captivate listeners with engaging stories. On the other hand, ChatGPT from OpenAI is adept at producing conversational responses that resemble those of a human. These models have attracted a lot of interest and are extensively used in many different industries. This post will compare Bard and ChatGPT in-depth, looking at their advantages and disadvantages as well as applications and ways that companies may use their unique characteristics to enhance customer experiences and streamline operations in a constantly changing digital environment. While there are some parallels between Google Bard and ChatGPT, there are also some notable differences. In order to help you understand which platform is more dominant in different domains, this section will break down these differences and identify the advantages and disadvantages of each. TL;DR: In order to help readers understand the subtle distinctions between Google Bard and ChatGPT, this section offers a succinct summary of the opposing features and functionalities of each platform.

Coding proficiency

When we compared ChatGPT and Bard's coding proficiency, we found some significant disparities in their performance: When it came to deciphering unclear instructions, ChatGPT performed better than Google Bard and produced cleaner code. It also did a better job than Bard at illuminating the resulting code and provide more precise insights into how it works. But Google Bard demonstrated a clear benefit in reworking code. It provided benchmark-creating code in addition to benchmark findings, in addition to optimized code solutions. This feature highlights Google Bard's prowess in writing effective and performant code. Google Bard has an edge over ChatGPT in this regard because it uses search engine data in addition to being a Large Language Model (LLM), whereas ChatGPT is limited to being an LLM at the time of testing

Surfacing images from the web for visual context

Right now, Google Bard is without a doubt the winner in this specific area. This is explained by the fact that when a user searches ChatGPT, it does not produce any images as result. For example, Bard provides illustrations with their answers when you ask about the top two places to travel to in Europe:

Conversely, ChatGPT does not offer any visual responses; it only offers plain text responses. Google Bard emerged victorious.

Conversation retention ability

What sets ChatGPT apart from Google Bard is its capacity to preserve context from prior exchanges. ChatGPT does not actively use the 3,000 words of conversation history that it has stored to produce responses. As a result, ChatGPT could find it difficult to keep up the flow of the conversation and provide accurate responses in later exchanges. On the other hand, Google Bard is notable for its ability to remember and utilize context from previous conversations. This allows it to use what it knows about previous interactions to better personalize responses. As such, Google Bard performs exceptionally well in terms of accuracy and maintaining coherence throughout the course of lengthy chats.

Number of third-party integrations

Both Google Bard and ChatGPT raise a lot of security and privacy issues. Due to ChatGPT's link to ransomware and phishing emails, there may be cybersecurity issues. Conversation logs are kept up to date, personal data is collected for training purposes, and discussions are reviewed by humans. It is not possible to remove particular prompts from ChatGPT's history, which discourages users from giving private or sensitive information. Many businesses have made the decision to forbid using Google Bard and ChatGPT on their property. For instance, in response to incidents of sensitive data leaking, Samsung Electronics prohibited its staff members from using ChatGPT. One employee asked ChatGPT to summarize a business meeting transcript that they had copied and pasted. Another time, a worker entered confidential software code into ChatGPT to look for code.

Language support

For AI language models such as ChatGPT and Bard, language support is an essential component that allows for greater accessibility and inclusion for users globally. Bard reflects Google's commitment to linguistic diversity by supporting 40 languages at the moment, including Korean and Japanese. Bard can efficiently serve a broader global user base and provide language-specific insights and support by supporting a wide range of languages. Contrarily, ChatGPT claims to support more than 50 languages, enabling users to communicate with the system in the language of their choice. People with varying linguistic backgrounds can engage with the platform in a comfortable manner thanks to its broad language support, which facilitates efficient communication and understanding. ChatGPT wins this category because of its wider language support, which offers users improved accessibility and linguistic inclusion.

Other observations

Given the considerable risk of misusing AI-generated content, Google Bard stands out for its capacity to access real-time information alerting users about possible factual mistakes.

Three drafts are available with Google Bard, giving users a variety of artistic alternatives to polish their work. Google Bard's restricted attribution provision, which may be strengthened to increase content legitimacy, is a disadvantage.

As opposed to Google Bard, ChatGPT does not offer attributions, which customers who want greater response transparency may find important to take into account. Both ChatGPT and Google Bard have a tendency to generate lengthy answers unless the prompts precisely specify what is expected.

Latest Google Bard and ChatGPT updates

Google Bard and ChatGPT are the leaders in the AI space and release improvements on a regular basis. The generative AI experience that users of these platforms get from these updates keeps getting better. Let's examine some of the most recent ChatGPT and Google Bard changes. Updates on ChatGPT (September 2023) Voice (Beta) for Users with Plus: Voice capabilities are one of the most notable aspects of the most recent ChatGPT upgrade. This feature, which lets you have natural, back-and-forth audio chats with your AI helper, is now accessible to Plus users on both iOS and Android. With ChatGPT's voice feature, you can have a chat while on the go, resolve a pleasant argument, or need a bedtime story.

Power-Up Your Business Using our AI Plugin Development Services

We have examined the distinct advantages and uses of each AI language model in this comparison of ChatGPT and Google Bard. By partnering with Simform in technology, you may fully utilize ChatGPT and Google Bard for your business requirements. Our skilled development team and AI specialists can provide unique AI plugins that are suited to your particular organizational requirements. We can help you leverage ChatGPT's power to improve customer experiences and your business processes, whether you need content generating tools, an AI-powered virtual assistant, or a chatbot for customer service.